THE NEW
TEACHER MENTORING PROCESS: A WORKING MODEL
Barry Sweeny, 1992
This article and the chart below are a "working model" of
the stages and transitions which the mentoring process seems to take.
The model has been constructed and refined from the feed back and
experiences of dozens of new teacher mentors since 1988. It is offered
here as a guide for new mentors.
The stages of the mentoring process usually require about two school
years to evolve and to mature to a conclusion. Some mentoring relationships,
however, take more or less time depending on the relative strengths
of the protege and the mentor. During those two years the mentor
and protege meet on a regular basis. Usually the frequency is:
- Daily meetings during the week just before and the week school
starts
- 3-4 times a week until the end of September
- 1-2 times a week during the rest of the year, and
- About 4-6 times a month during the second year.
It is interesting to note that the personal style of the mentor
& protege may impact how the mentoring process and relationship
evolve. In some cases the mentor & protege may be very social
and outgoing and so may quickly build their personal relationship
early in the process and more gradually develop their professional
dialogue. In other cases, the demands of the tasks of teaching and
mentoring may be the initial priority of more task-oriented mentors
& proteges. In the later case the mentoring pair may first build
a professional relationship and then, through their professional
work, continue to deepen and strengthen their mutual trust and personal
relationship. Experience has shown that as long as the mentor and
protege are aware of the dual (task & relationship) nature of
their work, the transitions they must make, and the overall mentoring
process, either approach seems to be effective.
A tougher challenge occurs when the mentor and protege are not
of a similar style and one person wants to emphasize building their
relationship while the other is more task-focused. Considering this
situation as one to be avoided, some programs think the best solution
is to match mentor and protege by personality type or educational
philosophy.
Experience however, has taught mentor experts that the best solution
is NOT to match for styles because such matching seems to reduce
the opportunity for mentor & protege to learn from each other.
Instead, mentors must adapt their mentoring style to remain appropriate
to the needs of the protege throughout the mentoring process. Usually
this means that the mentor is more directive early in the
year when there is lots to learn and much of it is "one right
answer" kinds of information. Later in the process, as the
relationship grows and the protege develops skills and some professional
maturity, the mentor can become more a "explainer" and
later a "supporter and encourager" and less a directive
leader.
In addition to working with the assigned mentor, the protege also
is led (by the mentor) to connect with other teachers who are effective
models of continuous professional growth, of effective teaching,
and of collaborative and collegial staff relationships. In this
way mentoring becomes a "team effort" that promotes interdependence
and collaboration, not isolated teaching and trial & error professional
growth. Such an approach to "team mentoring" fosters the
norm that we all can learn from and support each other. Using a
mentoring process like this has been shown to facilitate professional
growth of new teachers and mentors alike and to promote the more
collaborative school culture we need to create to improve student
learning.
| PROCESS STAGES |
MENTORING ACTIVITIES |
THE PURPOSE |
| INTRODUCTION |
Introductions, sharing of backgrounds, interests & personal
information. |
CREATE A CONNECTION |
| FOUNDATION |
Explain mentor-protege roles, relationship & the mentoring
process. Explain expectations. |
CLARITY OF PURPOSE |
| ORIENTATION |
Orientation to the school, grade, department, staff, district
& community.
Orientation to new job responsibilities, curriculum &
expectations |
REDUCE THE STRESS & INCREASE THE TEAM FEELING |
| COLLABORATION |
Work together to prepare classroom for start of school.
Mutual sharing of ideas, discovering how room layout, management
plan, and good instructional environment support each other
& promote learning. |
GOOD START, BUILD TEAM, MENTOR SEEN AS A CARING HELPER |
| PROBLEM SOLVING |
Joint analysis of issues and problems
Development of options, strategies & plans to implement
& evaluate results |
DEVELOPMENT OF THINKING & KNOWLEDGE |
| PERSONAL FRAMEWORK |
Building a strong mentor-protege relationship
Reinforce protege self-esteem & confidence
Explore each others dreams for teaching, views & strengths
as teachers & as persons |
MENTOR IS SEEN AS TRUSTWORTHY & AN OPENNESS IS CREATED |
| PROFESSIONAL FRAMEWORK |
Discovering the "big picture" such as:
1. planning activities as a sequence
2. assessing learning and adjusting instruction
3. worrying less about following lesson plans & more
about accomplishing a lesson's purpose |
MENTOR SEEN AS A MODEL & PROTEGE IS INCREASING SKILL,
INSIGHT |
| PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT |
Building a 2-way coaching relationship where mutual feedback
and support for learning is the norm. |
PROMOTE MENTOR & PROTEGE GROWTH |
| TRANSITION |
Building a peer relationship, promoting the protege's ability
to work independently, but maintaining support for each other's
growth.
Promoting learning & support links with other staff,
creating a broader team concept |
PROMOTING MENTOR & PROTEGE INTER-DEPENDENCE |
|